The pen may be a mightier tool than the sword, but not when we’re using it to lobotomize ourselves - Douglas Rushkoff. |
More than a decade ago, Teddy Ssezi Cheeye’s ‘atom splitting’ Uganda Confidential made a sudden U-turn and became a paper for ‘modernity’. But how did one of the most feared and resented government critics develop feet of clay? Were his soles cracking under the weight of pressure even before he threw in the towel? And who was exerting this pressure? These and more, are some of the questions that were ringing in many a reader’s mind.
But it wasn’t long before the answer came in. Uganda Confidential was a thin affair. But after embracing modernity, the vociferous newsletter suddenly grew obese, and twice or thrice published as many as 100 pages, mostly adverts from government.
To put it in perspective, let me state that ‘modernising’ Uganda was one of the reasons that Museveni cited in 1996 to justify why he thought he was best placed to continue as president.
I used to be an ardent reader of Andrew Mujuni Mwenda, the Managing Editor of the Independent magazine, as well as a fan of the writings of Charles Onyango Obbo, and Timothy Kalyegira. Mwenda while still at Makerere occasionally signed off his commentaries with ‘the writer is a student of contemporary politics’.
And it was Mwenda, then a firebrand, bullish, intelligent, confident know-it- all, who first raised the red flag about Cheeye’s abnormally obese newsletter with a screaming headling:‘Gov’t bribes the independent press,’ in The Monitor, now Daily Monitor. In that article, he questioned the logic of why government was spending millions of shillings advertising in a paper with such a low circulation, and concluded that the government was bribing Cheeye through adverts.
Before then, Mwenda and Cheeye had had a cat and mouse intellectual relationship, fighting several public battles on development economics, public policy and globalisation, among other topics.
In September this year, Cheeye lost his appeal in the Supreme Court and was carted back to Luzira to serve a ten-year prison sentence for causing a financial loss of 120 million shillings to the Global Fund. It was such a twist for a man who was once a fierce critic of corruption. Cheeye’s jailing deprived Mwenda of someone who had been a regular and willing sparring partner.
Coincidentally, Cheeye’s fall began about the same time that Mwenda’s was on the rise or fall (depending on who you ask). In December 2007, the bohemian journalist launched The Independent. He said the magazine would be Uganda’s equivalent of The Economist (it has not lived to that billing but neither has it been a complete failure).
But now, Mwenda finds himself in the same situation that Cheeye found himself more than a decade ago. The Independent gets millions in advertising deals from Rwanda just like the Uganda Confidential did from the Ugandan government after the owner embraced the NRM. So would Mwenda say that he has been bribed by Rwanda?
Responding recently to comments posted on the Uganda Journalists Facebook page about the numerous rumours against him, particularly the reasons why he did not publish the infamous oil documents when he claims he was the ‘first man’ in Uganda to receive the documents, Mwenda showed that a lot of water had flowed under the bridge since he accused Cheeye.
‘It is by balancing the conflicting interests of readers, advertisers, government and donors that a media house is able to survive. These pressures are not necessarily bad,’ he wrote.
‘If you lean too much on your advertisers or donors or government, you may lose your audience etc. Whether it is CNN, Sky or New York Times these challenges are delt(sic) with daily and independent and Mwenda therefore are not an exception,’ he added.
Andrew Mujuni Mwenda, Managing Editor, The Independent. |
In July when the Daily Monitor run a story that Mwenda’s sister and former Kabarole Woman MP. Margaret Muhanga and Information Minister Karoro Okurut were involved in a shady land deal, Mwenda responded with fire on Capital FM by throwing spiked jabs at a top executive at the Namuwongo based media house. But the victim of his virulent attack did not respond to his accusations, not publicly atleast. Or if he did, then I missed it. It would have been different story, had it been with Cheeye. The debate would have rumbled on for weeks.
Often times, on radio, one may be tempted to think that when Mwenda is speaking he’s competing against himself to finish whatever he wants to say in the allotted time( this is not communication). The radio host has to constantly peg him back lest he takes charge of the studio.
This could perhaps be a small indication that Mwenda misses his mate Cheeye. Whenever I hear Mwenda on the radio, I draw a mental picture of a boxer eagerly itching for a fight but without a willing opponent; and so the boxer concludes that he is the best fighter.
But in Mwenda, media trainers and journalists have a positive example from which to learn; that writing good essays alone does not make one a good journalist. Journalists need a firm grasp of the content that the essays are supposed to convey. This is a key requirement in public affairs reporting.
The writer is a post graduate student, in the department of Journalism and Communication at Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
The writer is a post graduate student, in the department of Journalism and Communication at Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Class, you are encouraged to share your thoughts about this and other articles posted on the site.
ReplyDeleteMwenda was at the university yesterday speaking to journalism and communication students. He made some pretty strong points one of them being that journalists must contexualise what they write. Drifting to his pet subject, Rwanda, he argued that the achievements of Rwanda and its weakness must be viewed within the context that it was a broken country in 1994 and has not had an opportunity to inherit what he termed 'institutional traditions' like Uganda and yet Rwanda has gone on to make remarkable achievements in health, ICT, infrastructure... I asked him about what he wrote about Cheeye a decade or so ago. He agreed that he did, but quickly added that Rwanda advertising in The Independent does not mean he has been bribed because The Independent is the 'biggest'paper in Rwanda. He said Rwanda is working with him because he has a 'positive view' of the country. I did not have the opportunity to ask him when 'positive view' becomes propaganda(some members of the audience accused him of being a paid mouth). It was an energetic and an insightful discussion performance from Mwenda. He's promised, like James Bond, that 'he will be back'at the Hill.
ReplyDeleteIt’s Called “Bullying Media Owners into Editorial Compliance…”
ReplyDeleteThis is how it comes about…and allow me concentrate on media luminary, Andrew Mwenda and his media company, and not Seezi Cheye.
Mwenda was all negative because he worked in other people’s business i.e., the Daily Monitor. Even then, he was a liability to the business possessor, the Agha khan.
A story is told of how Museveni called the Agha Khan, who lives in Paris. He, Museveni, would easily close the former’s businesses in Uganda if he kept funny journalists at the Daily Monitor. The doable shut-down would be as effortless as you close a water tap. Our media possessor had just been awarded the financially thirst-quenching Bujagali dam project.
That is how Mwenda and Timothy Kalyegira reportedly left the Monitor. Obbo Onyango Charles had earlier left the paper under a comparable situation. (Does this mean the current leadership at Daily Monitor has been bullied into editorial conformity?)
Then, Mwneda and Kalyegira started their own newspapers. Mwenda virtually failed to print and publish the first Issue of his paper, The Independent. Government had blocked all possibilities. This is when he made the first known dishonorable concession. Kalyegira never compromised, and his online paper is a deceased thing.
There are of-course other factors. Mwenda appears dare-devil because he has secret secure heavens: Museveni’s is a family friend to his parents. Muhozi, the first son, is his fine friend. Mwenda has numerous siblings who’ve worked at State House.
…and Mzee Boniface Byanyima has before said in published interviews that Museveni should be asked who his earliest wife was and what happened to her. The answer works to Mwenda’s favour.
Yet me thinks, (as Nobert Mao would say of Museveni), Mwanda qualifies to be a case study of sorts. The ‘boy’ is well read, widely traveled, brave and has key, high-level contacts. These attributes have turned him into a power-broker among the powerful.
A friend who’s a loose-minded supporter of Mwenda told me thus: ” Mwenda has now grown. He’s securing his future and that of his children (thru’ compromises in his media business and journalism practice). “
…and the future of his children. I smiled. He doesn’t have children (yet). When he was speaking to MUK Mass Communication students on November 17, 2011 on the topic: How the Uganda Media has handled the Oil Debate, (I was there), Mwenda said: “I can bet my dick that the documents implicating ministers over oil bribes are fake.”
Quite a crusade, I thought. So how would he have children if he lost the bet? Thru’ the non-natural line of attack perhaps?
I wish myself a blissful research experience on the topic Media Possession and Control soon.
Of course Journalists principally are men/women who present that information as news to the audiences of newspapers, magazines, radio or television stations or the Internet. Some journalists have the desire to be kwon so they want their work to be recognized by others. Yes this helps to give it value. Others want to be recognized, so that they have status in the eyes of society. It is not a bad motive though but this must never become the main reason for being a celebrated journalist. I do believe that Andrew Mwenda has absolutely practiced his journalistic principles, except ever since he turned into the ‘Rwanda Mouth Piece of sort’ a lot has been left in question.
ReplyDeleteHowever, there is a difference between the desire to influence events for your own sake, and the desire to do it for other people. I think anybody should never use journalism for selfish ends, but to use it to improve the life of other people. Remembering that people may not always agree with you on what those improvements should be.
Ok it should be understood that attaining knowledge just as Mwenda has done/continuing to do has many uses. It can simply help to make you a fuller and more interesting person. Also giving an individual power over people, especially those who do not possess that particular knowledge I personally appreciate his effort.
It’s true everybody trust journalists like Andrew with facts, either the ones he give or the ones he receive. With plenty of experience and practice, he has developed a special awareness of what makes news sense.
However, I think the best for Mwenda, should be to get on well with all sorts of people. Not behaving as if he is competing against himself including shouting and dominating any given topic. Sincerely, one cannot pick and choose who to interview in the same way as you choose who to have as a friend.